In this pdf, a model of teachers’ role in the e-learning system has been discussed. According to the model, this paper provides pathways for teachers to create online courses that engage students in e-learning more effectively. Moreover, in the second part of the model, this paper presents information for teachers about how to benefit from free tools to create lessons and applications for e-learning.
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010) 5775–5787
Roles of teachers in e-learning:
How to engage students & how to get free e-learning and the future
ølker Yengina, Dilek Karahocab *, Adem Karahocab, Ahmet Yücelb
College of Education and Human Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, USA
Software Engineering Department, Bahcesehir University, Ciragan 34353 Besiktas, Istanbul, Turkey
Received November 15, 2009; revised December 3, 2009; accepted January 25, 2010
In this paper a model of teachers’ role in the e-learning system has been discussed. According to the model this paper provides
pathways for teachers to create online courses that engage students into e-learning more effectively. More over in the second part
of the model, this paper presents information for teachers about how to benefit from free tools to create lessons and applications
© 2010 Elsevier Ltd. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license.
Keywords: E-learning; active learning; motivation; feedback; FOSS.
In the information management systems human agents can be considered one of the most important factors that
make system run more smoothly (Peterson & Peterson, 1988). In this manner role of teachers in the e-learning
environments are very important. The questions “Does the importance of teacher decrease as the technology
grows? “ And “What is the role of teachers in e-learning systems” are very important to answer to estimate the
productivity of systems (Johnson, 1991).
When we think about the role of the teacher in the learning environment it could be suggested that the importance
of the teacher is growing. The educators’ afford should be more intensive to adaptation of new learning
environments should be an answer to this question. But there are some issues adapt these new learning
environments. These issues of adapting to the environment are related to understand the concept and the work
process of these environments. For example, administrators of the institutions can understand some basic concepts
of e-learning such as how it works and where and why to benefit from it. However these decision makers will find
themselves in the point of milestone to apply or not apply the concept in their institutions. More importantly,
teachers also will be a point of a decision making when they need to teach any course in e learning (or blended).
These decisions possibly would be about “How to put any course online with an effective way to engage students in
* Dilek Karahoca Tel.: +902123810587; fax: +902123810550
E-mail address: [email protected]
1877-0428 © 2010 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license.
5776 Ilker Yengin et al. / Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010) 5775–5787
to the learning?” and “What technologies and tools are available to implement the teaching (e-lessons or the
materials for blended learning)?”
In this paper, we provide a basic model to help educators to answer these two questions and decide their teaching
model. Figure 1 shows the summary of basic components of this model.
First part of this model explains “How to put any course online with an effective way to engage students in to the
learning?” and the second part explains “What technologies and tools are available to implement the teaching (e-
lessons or the materials for blended learning)?”
Figure 1. Model for Designing and Implementing an E-Learning Course
1.1. First Part: “How to put any course online with an effective way to engage students in to the learning?
In this model in first part there are issues about deciding learning strategies of e learning. This part covers three
issues to implement an e-learning program: Active learning, motivation and feedback.
After understanding the first part of model in this paper, teachers can have general ideas how to build their own
teaching in e-learning environments and how to put their lesson effectively. These ideas are very general and can be
used as a base template.
1.1.1. Active Learning
The issue of making students to have a role actively in their learning and participate covers how to engage
students into their learning progress. Active learning strategies shortly suggest putting students into the center of
their learning. As the e-learning suggest a way of self regulated activities the active learning strategies may be very
helpful because the students are responsible into their learning and they get involved into the teaching rather than
Ilker Yengin et al. / Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010) 5775–5787 5777
just receiving simple lectures such as tutorials or presentations. Active learning strategies are and how to put them in
action are covered in the rest of the paper.
After the active learning strategies employed there are another issue of making students to have positive attitudes
to the lessons and the learning activities. In the e-learning as long as the most of the students will be at a distance the
motivational factors get more importance to make them to be connected into the lesson material. In this case
motivational issues need to be covered. So in this paper the issue of motivation and how to engage motivational
strategies in e-learning has been covered.
Feedback is the most important factor of any kind of communication, especially in learning. While designing and
implementing learning activities teachers need to be very aware of providing good feedback. In distance learning
(also e-learning) the feedback has more importance because the lack of face to face interaction. Therefore in
designing – teaching a learning activity teacher need to understand the importance of feedback and how to use it
properly. As the third and final issue in the first part of this paper we discovered the issues – ideas about feedback in
1.2. Second Part: “What technologies and tools are available to implement the teaching?”
1.2.1. Free Open Source Software
In the second part of the paper we investigate the tools and applications to run lessons online. The free and open
source software philosophy is discussed in this second part. As decision maker teachers also need to become
familiar to the existing technologies. There are several commercial tools readily available. Also there are totally free
tools to consider. The quality, ownership value, validity and reliability of open source software are sometimes fuzzy
for the teachers therefore this issue covered in this part.
In the conclusion section of the paper the future predictions about the technology and its ongoing way has been
discussed. The growing technologies and readily available solutions also discussed in this ending part.
2. First Part: “How to put any course online with an effective way to engage students in to the learning?
2.1. Active Learning
A student-centered approach is more likely a teaching methodology and instructional activities involving
students in doing things and thinking about what they are doing. The learner-centered instruction attempts to engage
students in activities that support knowledge constructions through media use, but which are not designed to control
learning. In this model, learners use media to investigate and to think. This type of learning activity can lead to it
being described as active learning (Bonwell, & Eison, 1991). Some of the strategies promoting active learning in
the classroom are as follows:
x Students are involved in more than listening.
x Less emphasis is placed on transmitting information and more on developing
x Students' skills.
x Students are engaged in activities (e.g., reading, discussing, and writing).
x Greater emphasis is placed on students' exploration of their own attitudes and values.
5778 Ilker Yengin et al. / Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010) 5775–5787
Also the key principles of active learning suggested by Barnes (1989) are as follows:
x Purposive: the task is seen by the learner as relevant to his/her concerns;
x Reflective: the learner reflects on the meaning of what is being learnt;
x Negotiated: the teacher and learner negotiate the goals and methods of learning;
x Critical: the learner appreciates different ways of interpreting learning;
x Complex: the learning tasks reflect real life complexity;
x Situation-driven: the learning tasks arise out of the needs of the situation;
x Engaged: the learning activities reflect real life tasks.
Motivation directly affects the way people learn (Weiner, 1985; Corpus et al., 2009) as they put emotional
investment – interest to achieve a task in their learning process. In many articles the importance of the motivation is
highlighted that the success (Deci, Koestner, & Ryan, 1999; Deci, Koestner, & Ryan, 2001; Pintrich, 2003;
Entwistle& Thompson, 1979; Schmidt, Stephen, Zdzinski& Ballard, 2006; Siebert et al., 2006) of a learning
program or the students is closely related with motivation of the students. Therefore the motivational factors should
be considered in e-learning course design (Keller& Suzuki, 2005; Cocea& Weibelzahl, 2006). The ARCS
motivational model (Keller & Burkman, 1993) provides a systematic approach in the design of the instruction
(online learning systems also). According to the ARCS model there are four components that need to be satisfied in
order to construct a learning system, including e-learning applications, which can motivate learners. These four
components are as follows:
A - Attention
R - Relevance
C - Confidence
S – Satisfaction
Using these four component based ARCS model in our e-learning lectures and design is the another important
question. Keller asserts that (2004) the ARCS model is valid enough to use in various kinds of e-learning strategies.
Also there are studies showed that the ARCS model is very useful to improve e-learning programs (Chyung,
Winiecki, & Fenner 1999; Suzuki&Keller, 2006).
2.2.1. Motivational Strategies for e-Learning:
126.96.36.199. Attention Strategies
When students work in distance they could have attention problems therefore the presentation of the material
should make students focused in to the information. The lectures should maintain the attention at an optimal level.
The strategies to catch attention can be listed as follows (Keller&Burkman, 1993, Picar, 2004):
x Stimulating Perception
x Give incongruity and conflict
x Using different types of examples to demonstrate a concept
x Using humor
x Using inquiry
x Requiring participation (Active Learning – Use of Interactive materials – multimedia)
Ilker Yengin et al. / Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010) 5775–5787 5779
188.8.131.52. Relevance Strategies
The lecture – system should give opportunities to students finding the lesson material relevant to their goals.
Also the system or the lesson design should draw a general picture of the concept and tell them why they are taking
these materials in their syllabus and show them what is important for them in the lesson. The strategies are as
follows (Keller&Burkman, 1993):
x Give lecture – contents that present familiarity (track of course history – user profile tracking)
x Orient the goals of the students according to lesson or vice versa
x Show them examples of more experienced students
x Present the worth of finishing the class
x Show the future usefulness of the course
x Match their needs with the course (Learning Style Matching Using Data Mining)
x Show role models.
184.108.40.206. Confidence Strategies
The students need to feel confident after they finished the class. The confidence strategies in an e –leaning
program should focus learner performance. The students feel confident when they successfully complete the
assigned learning tasks in the e-learning system. The system should follow the student learning process closely and
match the difficulties – levels of learning tasks according to their performance. The strategies are as follows
(Keller&Burkman, 1993; Picar, 2004):
x Monitoring the learning requirements (Record keeping)
x Matching the difficulty (Adaptive learning strategies )
x Knowing the expectation of students and try to satisfy those
x Defining – announcing the success criteria (Using announcement tools)
x Presenting tools for goal setting – scheduling (Using calendar – event announcements)
x Providing immediate feedback (Use e-mail- discussion boards)
220.127.116.11. Satisfaction Strategies:
As the results of the learning activities in the e-learning system the students should feel the satisfaction in their
learning. The designers – instructors can enhance satisfaction of students with following these strategies
(Keller&Burkman,1993; Picar, 2004):
x Provide unexpected rewards (such as games)
x Implement positive outcomes (Give results – feedbacks immediate)
x Avoid negative punishments
x Scheduling – matching the course according to the students expectations
x Transfer knowledge into real world settings (Use simulations)
x Be fair in the test results
2.2.2. Design of an Intelligent (Such as an LMS) Web Based System That Detects the ARCS
Web based software can be developed to satisfy several user needs in motivational setting by taking account the
components of ARCS. In this web system – or e-learning system - the design of a simple course module should have
following specifications (Keller&Suzuki, 2004; Shellnut, Savage, & Knowlton, 1998; Perrin, 2005; Chen&Chen,
2006; Ardito et.al, 2004):
x The system should group the motivational tasks
x The system should detect – analyze users motivational aspects
x The system should allow to create objectives that enhance users motivation
5780 Ilker Yengin et al. / Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010) 5775–5787
x The system should support – implement motivational strategies (listed above)
x The system should filter and choose best motivational strategies for different users
x The system should support creation – storage and delivery of motivational work flows and objectives.
(Also integrate those within the lesson modules.)
x The system report – evaluate motivational results after each learning sessions
x The system should support the online communication (e-mail, IM, Video Conf.)
x The system should provide HELP options to enhance more user satisfaction
x The system should match usability factors
x The content visuals should be readable easily (screen design)
x The system should include interactive tools of learning
x The system support self regulated learning tools
x The system flow should support the guided sequence of steps in each lesson
The online learning system can help educators to implement more educational teaching strategies however the
instructors also need to be conscious about the need of monitoring their students’ performance – motivation levels
also. Within the help of ARCS model strategies the e-learning tools can be more beneficial to students to keep them
interested – attended to the class.
Feedbacks are the one of the most valuable tools in the e-learning systems because they allow us monitoring
and improving the performance of the students in several ways. In designing of information systems, feedback also
has an important role where it helps us to understand whether the targeted receiver (or the learner) fully got the
massage (Nevio, 2002). According to the Shannon’s Communication theory (Shannon, 1949) the targeted recipient
should receive the message and encode it fully in order to act in the communication. On the other hand the sender
also has to be sure the message has been sent correctly by observing the recipient's interpretation which also
returned to the sender (Shramm, 1954) .Also in the communication, the message sender should acts as the recipient
as a result of this respond of the receiver; which called feedback. Therefore feedback has a potential for measuring
or detecting the communication errors. Practically, those communication errors help us to provide guidance to the
students if we can catch them. To find errors, the action or the objective must be known exactly. These errors help
us to monitor whether there is a gap between what should be happening. On the other hand, it is a difficult process to
find communication errors without getting any feedback from the students.
Also there is a great chance to learn from those communication failures because it helps learners to see their
conditions and understanding about the concept. In real life situations also those failures should be used as an
opportunity that goes through success. Manz (2002) describe failures as opportunities with these words: “Usually,
failure or success is almost entirely in the eye of the beholder... Failure is very often a misperception about the
difference between what exists and goes unnoticed (such as growth and learning when we fall short of reaching a
goal) and what is realized later (longer term success)."
Most of the times students can make so many mistakes when they are new to the concepts and trying to
discover that concept by themselves. In that cases, the best thing can be done is to show them quickly what the
mistakes are and let them to have enough time and guidance to improve their performance in those parts that they
had problems. In general, if you give students a space to work on their ideas, the chance to experience their
mistakes you also should give them the chance to fail. There are several learning activities that can be used that let
the students to work on their ideas and have a chance of failure. In those activities the main roles of the teachers are
to monitor students, catch their mistakes, let them to know their mistakes and give them guidance to correct their
mistakes. Discussions boards with brain storming sessions, cooperative learning, worked examples , class projects -
research and in class activities in active learning are the cases where the instructor can provide a good way to let
their students to have some mistakes freely and provide guidance to improve them using performance related
feedbacks. In those cases the feedback can be given immediately before waiting until the figuring that the students
have some problems or they don’t get the ideas in the lesson. Also to have those immediate feedbacks, the teachers
should monitor students’ activity by observing or asking some questions to let an on demand clarification.
In discussion forms students can generate ideas freely and talk about those ideas. These discussions should start
with a brain storming session where all the students can present their ideas freely. Then they can discuss those ideas
Ilker Yengin et al. / Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010) 5775–5787 5781
and evaluate each other’s ideas. In that case they can have further discovery in certain ideas also. The teacher also
can lead those discussions to make student to generate a final goal or idea about the topic and also she can guide
them to gain further understanding about the ideas.
Similarly to the in discussions, the students can also have some activities in groups where they provide
feedback for one another about their work. The teacher can also monitor the groups’ works by monitoring their
activities regularly. If the teacher wants she can also has an inference to those groups’ activities to correct something
and give feedback and guidance.
Active learning in the class is also a good way to provide students to engage their own learning where we can
also have performance related feedback. Similar to in class projects and research, in active learning students are
required to take action in the class by actively participating. For example they can participate lectures by taking
notes, posing questions, involving role playing or games. In those performances the teacher or the learning system
can monitor the activities and can provide feedback.
Other activities where students can have feedbacks are tests, inquiry, guided inquiry and scaffolding. In those
activities, however the teacher cannot monitor the whole ongoing progress to give immediate constructive
feedbacks. They can just give formative feedbacks according to end results of the students. For example in mastery
learning tests provide some results for students to have a corrective instruction and give chance them to retest; but
it is so hard to detect the exact nature of the problem such as a misunderstanding of a student in a solution part of the
problem which leads wrong results in the test.
Another issue in the learning, it is sometimes difficult to find good feedbacks. Especially when the students
develop a certain skill and get experienced. Sometimes teachers think that the learners are good enough to find their
own mistakes; if they get experienced in their learning. So in that cases, to have a good help seeking and self
monitoring ability will be very helpful to those students. Before seeking any help the learners should be aware they
need help because of they have a problem in their performances. According to Sadler (1989), to detect a mistake or a
problem the learner has to have an understanding of the standard, compare his current level of performance
according to these standards, and plan - get correct actions to fill the gap. This type of a learning also considered as a
self regulated leaning where students compare their performance against a standard (Kitsantas, & Zimmerman,
1998; Clearly & Zimmerman, 2001) According to the several studies frequent self-evaluation produced positive
results regardless of the type of goal adopted (Kitsantas, Reiser & Doster,2004).
Usage of e- learning systems can be very useful for those self regulated students. In such a learning environment
it is possible to have some feedback and support students learning process. In e- learning environment , self
regulated learners also can monitor their performance within observing their actions in the system also following
the feedbacks provided by the system which are called The Intelligent Tutoring System, Computer Assisted
Instruction , Computer Based Instruction , Web Based System etc.
In such an e- learning environment students can get immediate feedbacks according to their performance within
several computer managed activities such as drill /practice, problem solving, games, simulations, tutorials and online
lectures. In those activities students can engage several cooperative learning opportunities to have peer feedback
such as in online discussions with instant messaging or forums, online games, Wikis and online simulations.
Also the computers can give the opportunity to follow classical class activities in a local network or a web
environment where a feedback mechanism can be provided by the teacher, by the system itself or mixed. These
activities are virtual classes, online collaborative projects and E-portfolios.
2.3.1. Feedbacks in E-Learning Environments
First of all the in the e-learning environments where students have to follow classes themselves, there is a
disadvantage of having immediate feedbacks. In those systems the instructor can give you immediate feedback only
in instant messaging or video conferencing sessions. Other feedbacks such as posting a feedback to your response /
answer or e-mailing etc .are almost asynchronous and therefore they are always coming after when the students
perform actions. In immediate feedback students have a chance to see their mistake quickly because they can have
an opportunity to discover their incorrect action just looking backward. If the students get feedback late than the
actions they could have some problems to remember their previous thoughts and actions in the past. They cannot
rely on their long term memory easily because it is very hard to discover the thoughts in the past exactly. So when
instructor says there is something wrong and asks to explain something in detail to make it clear the students will
have some problem to remember those previous thoughts to correct. Also in form discussions; rather than instant
messaging; it is sometimes hard to follow the concepts and flow of discussion because the students have to check
5782 Ilker Yengin et al. / Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010) 5775–5787
the posting regularly. If students cannot remember the previous entries to reply a posted question they will miss the
flow of the discussions easily. On the other hand, as long as the instructor cannot follow the students progress and
performance he just can give formative feedbacks according to students performance outcomes but the instructor
also have time to read all the post and evaluate these posts carefully in his free time.
In discussion forms, students also have some good feedback from his peers because they can have time to think
on the responses and time to construct a good question or feedback.
The most important disadvantages of those e- learning environments are lacking of physical presence and body
language such as face to face interaction and eye contact. Body language is a good communication tool where
student respond and make assumptions about the signals or feedbacks given in the class when they are interacting
with the instructor. Also instructor can give feedbacks for the steps in the responded assignment if he can have a
clue for those steps.
3. Second Part: “What technologies and tools are available to implement the teaching?”
3.1. Free Open Source Software (FOSS) & eLearning
Free Open Source Software (FOSS) is software which is liberally licensed to grant the right of users to study,
change, and improve its design through the availability of its source code (FreeOpenSoftware.Org). The FOSS
means that you can obtain the software free also you can change and distribute the software. Also the FOSS
philosophy requires a software (or technology) to be free to deliver, modify and customize without any license
payment. Because the software ownership is free and liberate it provides many opportunities especially to cut the
cost back and distribute – modify easily (Wheeler, 2007). The usage of FOSS is mostly beneficial to the developing
countries because it provides affordable know – how knowledge and easy technology adaptation (Zhao& Reisman,
1992). The FOSS is also easy to develop any kind of software (including eLearning system and tools according to
Bazaar Model (Raymond, 2009).In Bazaar Model anticipate that the FOSS need to be a development project that is
globally distributed within the communities of developers where they communicate and work in parallel on the
Internet. The developers also shows the signs of strong communities ( where they are also learners) by working in
peers, relying on peer review for their code debugging, making requirement analysis lists, using schedules and
getting help from experienced professional coders in the community (Swan, 2002).
The FOSS idea also could be used in e learning development. The usage of FOSS in e-learning is also depends
on some standards defined by several organization (ISO, 1999; IEEE, 2009; CEN/ISSS WSLT; 2009) so it is also (if
developed in standards) reliable and valid as other commercial e-learning software. In order to use FOSS in our e-
learning project the project managers or decision makers need to know the attributes of the FOSS to consider it as
an alternate. Some of the attributes of the FOSS are as follows (Coppola& Neelley, 2004):
x The implementation of FOSS is free there is no license cost. Also there is no additional cost for the
x The open source license give the change to use , modify, and redistribute freely
x The control of the property – ownership of the FOSS is equal between the consumers and the developer or
x FOSS provides rapid and diverse innovation ways because it is developed by a large community of
x FOSS will always be developing or using if it is useful and beneficial to community. The FOSS is rapidly
adapted by the community therefore if it is used a lot it is also safe to live long time. There is no chance of
failure like commercial software where the vendors always have the risk of getting out of business.
x FOSS is secure and reliable. Because FOSS projects mostly follow open standards (ISO, 1999; IEEE, 2009;
CEN/ISSS WSLT; 2009) .Also when the program is developing there is a peer review (including academic
and scientific community) therefore the program is checked regularly. Also the user of the FOSS is always
providing feedback so if there is a problem it is detected more quickly than the traditional commercial
x Generally (not necessarily) the FOSS supports larger spectrum of operating system and platforms
Therefore adaptation of the FOSS is easier. Also if FOSS doesn’t support a specific platform it is very easy
Ilker Yengin et al. / Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010) 5775–5787 5783
to convert re- code and redistribute it with little modification to make it available to work with that specific
3.1.1. Use of FOSS in eLearning
18.104.22.168. Determining the Learning Path:
In design of e-learning, before selecting any technology platform the learning methodology (a path) should be
considered. While defining the learning path, the objects, services, learning resource, activities of one learning unit
should be listed. According to Tuparova and Tuparov (Tuparova & Tuparov, 2006) these can be form up as
follows: Learning object – according to the IEEE LTSC definition – “any entity, digital or non-digital, which can
be used, re-used or referenced during technology supported learning” (IEEE, 2002). A learning object can be:
x Audio or video,
x Multimedia presentation or simulation,
x Test or test item
Service - The system provided item such as:
x Discussion forum,
x Chat room
x Audio or video conference,
Learning resource - can be any learning object or service.
Activities- The specific action carried by the students and instructor in the system using several services to ensure
the learning objects. The activities should be the followings:
x Documentations for reading, simulations, multimedia materials, tutorials;
x Audio/video lecture;
x Notes collection with special digital tools- note, journal;
x On- line discussions;
x Simulation or application software;
Learning unit – Defined as whether the representation of a course, or any kind of earning or teaching event (Kooper,
2005). It could also be a module, a chapter, a theme cluster of learning objectives or prerequisite items .After the
learning path elements has been defined and listed the path of the learning could be determined. The sequence of the
activities mainly shows the direction of the learning path. The adaptive learning systems (Paramythis, A., &
Reisinger, 2004) also could be a way of defining a student learning path. In this case the learning styles, level and
the success are the main factors to find the learning path.
3.1.2. Teaching/learning strategies for FOSS
First of all, the teachers using the FOSS philosophy can take an active role in the creating of the content and they
also can be the main root of determining students’ needs. Teachers can detect what are the needs of their students
and they can communicate with several developers in the community to fulfill these needs to modify existing FOSS.
The easy modification of FOSS can match these needs in the end. As the teachers can participate in the design and
development process of FOSS by subscribing mailing lists of products. They also become a part of community
therefore they can meet other teachers in the world and they can be a part of a learning community and they can
5784 Ilker Yengin et al. / Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010) 5775–5787
have active roles in the social networks. Also this mailing list can be open to the students so the need of them can be
listen in the first place. Usage of FOSS also help students to understand the ethical issues (Floridi, 2004)and they
can be more responsible to the digital rights (Wolfgang , Bauer & Kettemann, 2008) because using the FOSS
decrease software piracy (Hartley, 2008; IPF, 2004).
Using FOSS tools is more beneficial to students and teachers to reconsider to delivery of the materials .Teachers
can give more home projects to students because the students can have the same software used in school freely so
they can work at home and create materials by themselves. This also can be implementing in the e-learning model
because the teacher can be sure she that the required software is not issue to implement projects. Also as the need to
come school labs. Reduces the more distance learning opportunity is ensured. There is a greater benefit for the
active learning and the switch to FOSS (Lin & Zini, 2006) has more opportunities and create flexible learning
environment such as creating dynamic and socially complex processes of collaborative learning.
In short ,when considering the usage of these FOSS related strategies the teachers has a great role where they
make decisions about selecting the appropriate tools for learning and designing the learning (both traditional or e-
learning). The teacher also need to be aware of strategies of active learning and motivation (see the related parts in
this paper) in online learning environments. She can also need to know the available tools and technologies of FOSS
in order to use them in teaching. The most beneficial part of the FOSS is that it can be specific to the learners needs
also in the design of the learning the FOSS can be very easy to modify. The involvement of the teachers into the
FOSS community can ensure the quality of the work and learning to see the real needs, success of learning using
these technologies and the experience of learners and teachers.
3.1.3. FOSS and Available Tools for e-Learning
There are tools for FOSS both for designing e-learning materials. In the design there are FOSS tools such as
graphics, video – audio files, animation etc. In the e-learning management there are FOSS based LMS tools also.
22.214.171.124. Tools for Designing Learning Materials:
Audio Recording: Audacity (http://audacity.sourceforge.net/) is a free audio editor and recorder. Teachers can
record audio, convert tapes and records into a digital file, edit MP3 files, mix sounds together and change the sounds
dynamics in the recordings with that tool. This tool also can be used to record an MP3 file to be used in the
Program Image Editing: The GNU Image Manipulation Program (http://www.gimp.org/) is a photo editing
tool. Teachers can use this tool to create – edit graphics and photo file for their lessons. They create and modify
many of the known digital photo file.
Screen Recording: Most of the e-learning lessons may need some screen recording because teachers need to
show something to the students in their desktops. Wink (http://www.debugmode.com/wink/ ) is a very good tool to
achieve this purpose. Also with screen recording teachers can have tutorial and presentation on how to use software
applications. Using Wink teachers can capture screen shots, add some labels to the video and have a step by step
FLASH based tutorials.
Web Content Design – Development: Teachers need to publish some content online and they need to embed this
into the web system. The use of HTML and XML languages is the old way of doing that. Use of applications to
create web content is easier than learning these languages. eXe (http://exelearning.org/) is FOSS applications that
help teachers to create, edit, format web content, package and export resources in IMS Content Package, SCORM
1.2, or IMS Common Cartridge formats. Also myUdutu (http://www.myudutu.com/myudutu/login.aspx) is FOSS
tools that help teachers to have SCORM compliant e-learning courses. myUdutu give the opportunity to have
collaboration online, stencil based editing, WSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) and templates – built in
126.96.36.199. LMS Tools:
LMS tools (is very similar to the Km and CMS) use specialized tools – services for the instruction. LMS
(Roqueta, 2008) has the (almost) all the application required for administration and course delivery. An instructor
an LMS) to manage courses, deliver - share information by creating, editing, storing several instructional media
online over internet. There are several LMS project developed under the mentality of FOSS. These are as follows:
Ilker Yengin et al. / Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010) 5775–5787 5785
Moodle: Moodle (http://moodle.org/) is designed to help teachers to create almost any kind of online courses.
According to Moore (Moore, 2005) one of the main advantages of Moodle over other systems is a strong grounding
in social constructionist pedagogy. As the Moodle is a FOSS anyone can freely use or modify it. The Moodle can
run any kind of servers hosting the PHP engine (Unix, Linux, Windows, and Mac OS X). The Moodle also uses
database support (which is costly to get a license also) freely on MySQL and PostgreSQL. Also Moodle can use
commercial databases such as Oracle, Access, Interbase, ODBC and others. It can support over 40 languages (most
of them are also developing countries languages). The available tools and modules of Moodle are design tools,site
management,,user management ,course management ,assignment module ,chat module ,choice module ,forum
module , journal module , quiz module ,resource module and survey module.
Sakai Project: Sakai Project (http://sakaiproject.org/portal) is a community project founded by The University
of Michigan, Indiana University, MIT, Stanford, the portal Consortium, and the Open Knowledge Initiative (OKI),
Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and the Hewlett Foundation. Sakai has many tools to help to organize lessons with
no knowledge of HTML. Lists of the teaching tools are announcements (sakai.announcements),assignments
(sakai.assignment.grades), calendar summary (sakai.summary.calendar) - a synoptic tool for events created in the
schedule tool,chat room (sakai.chat),drop box (sakai.dropbox),email archive (sakai.mailbox),forums (sakai.forums)
- discussion forums, formerly part of "message center",gradebook (sakai.gradebook.tool),messages (sakai.messages)
- for sending private messages, formerly included in "message center", news (sakai.news),post 'em (akai.postem) -
for quick uploading of feedback with an excel import,presentation sakai.presentation),resources sakai.resources),
schedule (sakai.schedule), section info sakai.sections),site info (sakai.siteinfo),syllabus (sakai.syllabus),tests &
quizzes (sakai.samigo),web content (sakai.iframe) and wiki (sakai.rwiki).Additional to these tools Sakai has many
administrator tools, e-portfolio tools, and other special tools.
LAMS:LAMS (http://www.lamsinternational.com/) is a new tool for designing, managing and delivering online
collaborative learning activities. LAMS gives the opportunity to the teachers to create a visual learning environment
with such activities as individual tasks, small group work and whole class activities. The LAMS Organization is an
ongoing project by the Macquarie University in Sydney Australia. Also LAMS LAMS can be used as a standalone
system or in combination with other learning management systems (LMS) such as Moodle, Sakai, .LRN, WebCT
and BlackBoard (LAMS Foundation, 2008).The available LAMS tools are assessment, branching, chat and
forum,image gallery,journal,mindmap,scribe,shared resources,spreadsheet,survey,task list,voting and wiki.
In this century the usage of communication and information processing software, production software are
improved a lot. Also next generation of those tools won’t be basic software running on digital devices only in
computers or computer enabled devices such as cell phones ,PDAs , personal music players or notebooks. The next
generation of the digital world will include interaction within the entire environment where embedded devices will
be more intelligent with instant and continuous connectivity to large networks like internet (Microsoft Research,
2009). Also these devices will let us to store large amount of data (Memories for Life Project, 2009) as much as we
need which will let us to keep every moment and movements in our lives. In those cases we will be living in an
environment where the information will be stored out of our brain. Also the information will be available instantly
(Ambient Networks,2006) when we need it and will be searched with several filtering mechanism that match
human thinking by using semantic approaches (Hakia, 2009). Therefore we won’t need to worry about to find
specific information to attack a problem or make something in the work place. In those cases in the future, the path
of instructional design should be reconsidered.
First of all, the students needs will be changed within changing life that technology will let us. Also the
workplace needs also will be changed because of the available technology. The first thing we consider in future
technology will be in the area of usage of information. Recall of facts and events will be useless because the on
demand technology will let us to reach those. So in workplace that knowledge of having information will not be a
wanted skill anymore. In that case the expertise of human will be valued as their ability to experience many ways of
solution of a problem , creativity and critical thinking. In near future there won’t be any super computers that can
solve problems and create something. So in workplace there will be still a need for human workers for those skills.
So analyzing and synthesis of information still will be a critical skill to survive in the world. Most importantly all
of those future technologies will let us to increase the chances of developing new learning scenarios where we can
include all of the senses into learning situation. That future context in the first place , we would like to implement a
5786 Ilker Yengin et al. / Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010) 5775–5787
system where students will be involving to the environment and practice their skills of analyzing and synthesis.
Researchers would like to implement a classroom technology where students can interact and explore within in the
Ambient Networks.(2006). Retrieved from: http://www.ambient-networks.org
Ardito , C. , De Marsico , M., Lanzilotti, R., et.al.( 2004).Usability of E-learning tools. Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced
Barnes, D. (1989) Active Learning (Leeds, University of Leeds TVEI Support Project).
Bonwell, C.C. & Eison, J.A. (1991) .Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ASHEERIC Higher Education Report No. 1,
George Washington University, Washington, DC.
CEN/ISSS WSLT.(2009). Retrieved from: http://www.cen.eu/CENORM/aboutus/index.asp
Chen, M. & Chen, W. (2006). Learner motivation and e-learning design: a multinational validated process. Retrieved December , 12,2009
Chyung Y., Winiecki, D. & Fenner, J. A. (1999) Evaluation of effective interventions to solve the dropout problem in adult distance education.
Clearly, T., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Self-regulation differences during athletic practice by experts, no-experts, and novices. Journal of
Applied Sport Psychology, 13, 61–82.
Cocea, M & Weibelzahl, S., (2006).Motivation – Included or Excluded From e-Learning. In Kinshuk, Sampson, D. G., Spector J.M., Isaias, P.,
Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age, CELDA 2006 Proceedings, pp. 435-437.
Cocea, M.(2006). Assessment of motivation in online learning environments. In: V. Wade, H. Ashman, B. Smith (Eds.) Adaptive Hypermedia
and Adaptive Web-Based Systems, 4th International Conference AH 2006 Proceedings, Springer-Verlag, pp. 414-418
Coppola,C. & Neelley,E.(2004).Open source - opens learning.Why open source makes sense for education. R-Smart Group. Retrieved from :
Corpus, J.; McClintic-Gilbert, Megan S. Hayenga, & Amynta O. (2009). Within-Year Changes in Children's Intrinsic and Extrinsic
Motivational Orientations: Contextual Predictors and Academic Outcomes Contemporary Educational Psychology .v34 n2 p154-166.
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M.(2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of
Educational Research,71(1), 1-27.
Deci, E.L., Koestner, R. & Ryan, R.M. (1999). A Meta-Analytic Review of Experiments Examining the Effects of Extrinsic Rewards on Intrinsic
Motivation. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 125, No. 6, pp. 627-668.
Entwistle, N. J & J. D, Thompson. (1979). Motivation and Study Habits , Wilson, Higher Education, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 379-39
Floridi,L.(2004).The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of computing and information.BlackWell:NY.
Free Open Software.(nd.). Org.FOSS.Retrieved from http://freeopensourcesoftware.org/index.php?title=Main_Page
GNU Image Manipulation Program(GIMP). http://www.gimp.org/
Hakia Inc.(2009).Hakia Semantic Search. Retrieved from http://company.hakia.com/technology.html
Hartley,M.(2008). Is Open Source the Answer to Software Piracy? Retrieved from:
IEEE.(2002).IEEE Standard for Learning Object Metadata, IEEE 2002; Soft cover; 2002; ISBN 0-7381-3297-7; Product No.: SH95001-TBR;
IEEE, Standard No.: 1484.12.1-2002
IEEE.(2009). IEEE Learning Technology Standards. Retrieved from: http://ieeeltsc.wordpress.com/
IPF.(2004). Free and Open Source Software – Effective Tool to Reduce/Overcome Software Piracy Rate in Central Asia. Intellectual Property
Rights and Internet in Central Asia Retrieved from: http://www.policy.hu/atoev/PDF_Presentations/FOSS_against_SWPiracy_Budapest.pdf
ISO SC36.(1999). Retrieved from:
Johnson, D.S.(1991). Productivity, the Workforce, and Technology Education. Journal of Technology Education.2,2.
Keller, J. M. & Burkman, E. (1993) Motivation principles, in: M. Fleming & W. H. Levie (Eds) Instructional message design: principles from
the behavioral and cognitive sciences (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Educational Technology Press).
Keller, J. M. & Burkman, E. (1993) Motivation principles, in: M. Fleming & W. H. Levie (Eds) Instructional message design: principles from
the behavioral and cognitive sciences (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Educational Technology Press).
Keller, J. M., & Suzuki, K. (2004). Learner motivation and e-Learning design: A mutinationally validated process. Journal of Educational Media,
29(3), 229-239. October 2004.
Keller, J.M. & Suzuki, K. (2004).Learner motivation and E-learning design: a multinationally validated process,Journal of Educational Media,
Vol. 29, No. 3,
Kitsantas, A., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Self-regulation of motoric learning: A strategic cycle view. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 10,
Kitsantas, A., Reiser, R.,A. , Doster, J. (2004). Developing Self-Regulated Learners:Goal Setting, Self-Evaluation, andOrganizational Signals
DuringAcquisition of Procedural Skills. The Journal of Experimental Education,72(4), 269–287.
Ilker Yengin et al. / Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010) 5775–5787 5787
Koper R.(2005). Modeling pedagogy with IMS Learning Design. UNFOLD CoP Meeting, Braga, 2005. Retrieved
LAMS Foundation.(2008).LAMS Documentation. http://wiki.lamsfoundation.org/display/lamsdocs/About+LAMS#AboutLAMS-whatIs
LAMS International. (2009).http://www.lamsinternational.com/
Lin,Y. & Zini,E.(2006).Free/libre open source software implementation in schools: Evidence from the field and implications for the future.
Computers & Education.50, 1092–1102.
Manz. ,C . (2002). The Power of Failure: 27 Ways to Turn Life's Setbacks into Success . Berrett-Koehler.
Memories for Life Project.(2009).Retrieved from :http://www.memoriesforlife.org/
Microsoft Research.(2009).Living with Intelligent Machines. Retrieved from: http://research.microsoft.com/en-
Moore J.(2005) .Open Source CMS based on Social Constructionist Pedagogy.The Sloan Consortium. Retrieved from: http://www.sloan-
Nevio, B.(2002). Communication systems : fundamentals and design methods .Chichester ; Hoboken, NJ : John Wile.
Paramythis, A., & Reisinger, S . (2004).Adaptive Learning Environments and e-Learning Standards. Electronic Journal on e-Learning,2,1181-
Perrin,D.G. (2005). Creative Online Learning Environments. Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. Retrieved from :
Peterson, M.C. & Peterson, O.T. (1988).The Dark Side of Office Automata ion: How People Resists the Introduction of Office Atomization
Technology. In Carey,M.J.(ed).Human factors in management information systems.183-194. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Picar,D.(2004). E-Learning and Motivation. ITEC 860. December 1, 2009 Retrvied from
Pintrich, P. R.(2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667-686.
Ragains, P. (1995). Four variations on Drueke's active learning paradigm. Research Strategies 13 (Winter). 40-50.
Raymond, E. S.(2009). The Cathedral and the Bazaar. Retrieved December , 12,2009 from: http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/
Roqueta,M.(2008). Learning Management Systems :A Focus on the Learner. Distance Learning 5(4), 59-66.
Sadler, R. (1989). Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems. Instructional Science. 18(1). pp. 1-25.
Sakai project. http://sakaiproject.org/portal
SAKAI TOOLS. http://confluence.sakaiproject.org/display/DOC/Tool+List+(2.5)
Schmidt,C., Stephen, F., Zdzinski, & Ballard,L. (2006). Motivation Orientations, Academic Achievement, and Career Goals of Undergraduate
Music Education Majors, Journal of Research in Music Education, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 138-153
Shannon, C. (1949). Communication Theory.The Mathematical Theory of Communication. .W. Weaver.
Shellnut, B., Savage, T. and Knowlton A. (1998). Using the ARCS Model To Design Multimedia College Engineering Courses. Report.
Retrieved December , 12,2009 From:
Shramm, W. (1954). How Communication Works,” in The Process and Effects of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. pp. 3-
Siebert, J., Litzenberg,K., Gallagher,R., Wilson,C. & Dooley, F. (2006). Factors Associated with Students' Academic Motivation in
Agricultural Economics Classes,. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 88, No. 3 , pp. 750-762.
Suzuki, K. & Keller, J. M. (1996) Creation and cultural validation of an ARCS motivational design matrix, paper presented at the Annual
Meeting of the Japanese Association for Educational Technology, Kanazawa, Japan.
Swan, K.(2002).Building Learning Communities in Online Courses: the importance of interaction .Education, Communication & Information ,
Vol. 2, No. 1.
Tuparova, D.& Tuparov,G. (2006).Learning paths in open source e-learning environments. Current Developments in Technology-Assisted
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548-573. EJ 324 684.
Wheeler,D.A. (2007), Why Open Source Software / Free Software (OSS/FS, FLOSS, or FOSS)? Look at the Numbers! Retrieved from
Wolfgang,B. , Bauer,V. & Kettemann, M. (2008). Internet Governance and the Information Society. Eleven International Publishing. p. 36. ISBN
Zhao,L. & Reisman,A. (1992). Toward Meta research on technology transfer. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 39(1):13–21,